Institutional and Governance Challenges in Recognizing Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1055Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Higher education, Quality assuranceAbstract
The development and spread of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools pose new challenges for higher education, not only at the pedagogical level, but also at the institutional and management levels. Assessing student performance, maintaining academic integrity, and ensuring the reliability of quality assurance and evaluation processes are becoming increasingly strategic issues for organizations. Many higher education institutions already have guidelines and regulations on artificial intelligence, but there is currently no uniform, reliable solution that can be applied at the institutional level to determine the extent to which a given product can be considered the student's own work and where AI-generated content begins. The limited reliability of currently available AI detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, Quillbot) further increases decision-making uncertainty and poses a risk to assessment and quality assurance systems. The aim of the study is to review the possibilities of identifying content generated by generative AI based on the literature, focusing its linguistic, content, and technical characteristics, and to analyse its institutional applicability from the perspective of higher education management and quality assurance. The results may contribute to more informed management decisions on regulating the use of AI, transforming assessment practices, and maintaining academic integrity.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

