The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Science Education: Comparative Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.963Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Science education, Comparative case studyAbstract
The purpose of this study is to comparatively examine the effectiveness of two distinct artificial intelligence tools, ChatGPT and DeepSeek, on students' learning process related to the 5th grade science unit entitled “Nature of Matter”. This research, conducted within the framework of a comparative case study design, involved two students selected through purposive sampling. Each student was given the opportunity to engage in the learning process through interaction with artificial intelligence tools and observations were conducted throughout the process. After the implementation, the perspectives of the students were obtained through semi-structured interviews. The data were evaluated by thematic analysis method and were categorized under four main themes: Concept understanding of artificial intelligence applications, depth of interaction, ease of use and student motivation. The findings showed that ChatGPT was more advantageous in terms of students' motivation, interaction level, adequacy of conceptual explanation and ease of use. The study suggests that artificial intelligence-supported learning environments can serve as effective complementary tools in classroom instruction.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

